M16.L04 ā Uncertainty and Expected Utility
Module: Module 16 ā Applications of Consumer Theory Lesson: L04 of 05 Duration: ~30 minutes Level: Intermediate Provenance: Intermediate Microeconomics with Excel (Barreto) | MIT OCW 14.01
Learning Objective
Evaluate choices under uncertainty using the expected utility framework.
Expected Utility Theory
Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function: EU = ĻāU(cā) + ĻāU(cā) Where: - Ļ = probabilities of states - U(c) = utility from consumption
Key properties: 1. Risk aversion: U''(c) < 0 (concave) 2. Risk neutrality: U''(c) = 0 (linear) 3. Risk loving: U''(c) > 0 (convex)
Worked Example
Australian context: Consider flood insurance for a $500k home: - 5% chance of total loss - 95% chance no loss - Premium: $30k
-
Expected value: EV = 0.05*(-500k) + 0.95*(0) = -$25k
-
Risk premium: For U(c)=āc, EU(no insurance) = 0.050 + 0.95ā500k ā 672.67 Certainty equivalent ā $452k Risk premium = $500k - $452k - $25k = $23k
Australians pay ~$12b annually in general insurance premiums (APRA 2023).
Common Misconception
"People always choose the option with highest expected value"
Actually, risk-averse individuals may accept lower EV to reduce uncertainty (e.g., buying insurance).
Key Takeaways
- Expected utility ā expected monetary value
- Risk preferences determine insurance demand
- State-contingent commodities allow hedging
- Australian insurance markets reflect risk aversion
Practice
- Calculate EU for U(c)=ln(c) with 50% chance of \(100/\)200
- Find the risk premium for U(c)=c^0.5 and a 10% chance of $1m loss
- Graph risk aversion levels for different utility functions
Further Resources
Provenance: Intermediate Microeconomics with Excel (Barreto) | MIT OCW 14.01