M13.L03 — Properties of Preferences: Convexity, Monotonicity, and More
Module: Module 13 — Budget Constraints, Preferences, and Utility Lesson: L03 of 05 Duration: ~30 minutes Level: Intermediate Provenance: Intermediate Microeconomics with Excel (Barreto) | Khan Academy Microeconomics
Learning Objective
Analyze how preference properties shape indifference curves and consumer behavior.
Fundamental Properties
- Completeness: Can compare any two bundles (A≿B or B≿A)
- Transitivity: If A≿B and B≿C, then A≿C
- Monotonicity: More is better (if A has ≥ quantities than B, then A≿B)
- Convexity: Averages preferred to extremes (if A∼B, then (A+B)/2 ≿ A)
Special Cases: - Strict convexity: Averages strictly preferred - Satiation: Bliss point exists
Worked Example
Australian Food Preferences
Consider a consumer choosing between meat pies (x₁) and vegemite toast (x₂):
- Show convexity holds for U=min(x₁, 2x₂)
- Take A=(2,1) and B=(4,2) → U=2 for both
- Average bundle C=(3,1.5) → U=min(3,3)=3
-
3 > 2 → convexity satisfied
-
Show MRS is undefined at kinks (perfect complements)
Common Misconception
"Convex preferences mean the utility function is convex"
Correction: The utility function is quasiconcave - convex preferences correspond to convex lower contour sets.
Key Takeaways
- Well-behaved preferences satisfy completeness, transitivity, monotonicity, and convexity
- Convexity implies diminishing MRS
- Strict convexity guarantees unique optimal bundles
- Non-monotonic preferences have bliss points
Practice
- Prove that U=x₁x₂ represents convex preferences
- Sketch indifference curves for a satiated preference
- Explain why transitivity prevents preference cycles
Further Resources
- 📺 Properties of Preferences — ANU Economics
- 📚 Varian Ch.3: Preferences
Provenance: Intermediate Microeconomics with Excel (Barreto) | Khan Academy Microeconomics